|594 forum posts|
inches for me .
30 what its are near enough a foot and 39 inches are a metre., and that is my lot .
|Pam Wegener||04/01/2011 08:09:50|
145 forum posts
Here is one to try from my grandmother.
Hold fabric in your hands and put your right hand up to your nose with one end of fabric, put your left arm at full reach to the side with the other end whilst looking straight ahead. If you measure that length it will be a yard (36") but if you turn your head to the right and take the end of the fabric to your nose it will be a meter (39"). I do it with a tape measure and it is exact, how do you all get on? I know you will have to try it.
5765 forum posts
Your are right on with the measurement from hand to nose. I've had hundreds of customers into the shop where I work and they ask how much a metre of fabric looks like so I just grab it and take it from the left hand to my nose with my head turned to the right....and it's normally bang on one metre...about 40". It really is a safe way of estimating.
|Irene B||04/01/2011 10:57:06|
4427 forum posts
I had to try it and the measurement was 38" So I was close.
|Janet M||04/01/2011 22:36:20|
5700 forum posts
My last word folks.... a rhyme for you all.
A METRE measures three foot three
It's longer than a YARD you see.
Over and out.
|Cathy Turner NZ||05/01/2011 08:21:26|
1416 forum posts
It took me years to finally work out metric and now that I am quilting, I find myself using imperial.
It annoys the hell out of DH when I insist in talking imperial but I find it easier than metric anyway. So it was not really a hardship going back to it.
One of the sliding windows in my kitchen is about 5 inches lower than the other because of my inabiltiy to convert properly. You can't notice it from outside as they are corner windows, and no-one seems to haved noticed it from the inside of the room. And I managed to blame it on DH and get away with it!
And I never buy a tape measure unless it has both on it. I like the lower numbers when I measure myself!
|Cathy Turner NZ||05/01/2011 08:31:40|
1416 forum posts
When I started work a million years ago, it was for the New Zealand Valuation Dept. and all land measurement was all acres, roods and perches!
1012 square feet was 1/4 acre, and I am so old I cannot remember the rest! Land surveyors used a chain to measure as well, And I have actually seen a chain measure thingy, in a museum.
Stick to inches, its easier.
|Janet M||07/01/2011 00:15:03|
5700 forum posts
well you live and learn don't you, cept me and metric! hahahaha
|Eliana Zerbinatti||09/02/2011 03:04:10|
|1 forum posts||I was born in Brazil where we always use the metric system and use seam allowance of 0.5 cm (0.75 cm I think too big). Also, add 1 cm is easier|
to add 1.5 cm, they would have to work most of the time with
measures "broken. "
When usage patterns in inches, I become to draw them instead of converting them.
I have mats and rulers in inches too, but almost
|Winnie the B.O.L.B||03/04/2013 15:05:58|
3285 forum posts
I just noticed this thread for the first time -after over a year on the forum!! - and wanted to add a comment to the debate, even after all this time since the last post.
I'm from Edinburgh but have lived over here in France for many years. Believe it or nt, I have only just recently managed to find a MACHINE patchworking group - all the others I found were 100% hand work which I hate - and am lousy at!!! Anyhow, the purpose of this post is to say that, by joining the group, i have encountered the metric patchworking rulers, patterns etc. and I find them very difficult. I work very happily in metric for everything else, including ALL other kinds of sewing, but for patchwork, I find it a nightmare.
My main reasons for this are
1) So many of our favourite patterns and books originate in America and I am very doubtful that they will ever change over to metric - at least not in our lifetime! I am not being in any way critical of the USA, just being realistic.
2) Because of that, so much that we use will cotinue to be produced in Imperial and will have to be converted for us to use them if we change to metric.
3) My experience of patchwork patterns and blocks converted from imperial to metric has not been good up till now. I have found, in the major patchwork magazines in Europe, that because, as far as I know, you cannot make EXACT conversions from inches to centimetres without a COMPLETE mathematical recalculation of the whole block design, they compensate for this by using different seam allowances everytime they convert a pattern - so the seam allowances in each pattern conversion vary from 0.5cm to 6.5cms to 7.5cms!!!! To my mind this is horrific and incredibly confusing. In addition, I know you can get the rulers in metric - I have seen many of them, including th eOmnigrid ones - but the marked lines are so difficult to see because the divisions are so tiny that it is very difficult to be accurate.
Here endeth MY rant!!!
Does anyone else out there still want to add anything to the debatet?
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Popular Patchwork or Patchwork & Quilting? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
Got a patchwork or quilting problem? Looking for a phone number or email address to ask someone for help? Click here to find the right person